Experience

Since the mid-1990s, the MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation has focused on research and quality improvement efforts to improve the quality of care for the chronically ill. Patients need comprehensive chronic care, but most health care delivery systems were originally designed mainly to treat acute illness. The MacColl Center's goal is to bridge this gap.

MacColl's approach to quality improvement falls into three main areas:

Diverse funding sources supporting the Center's work include national and international private philanthropic and governmental agencies.

The Chronic Care Model

Definitions of "chronic condition" vary, with some more expansive than others. The MacColl Center characterizes it as any condition that requires ongoing adjustments by the affected person and interactions with the health care system.

Almost half of all Americans live with a chronic condition. That number is projected to increase by more than 1 percent per year through 2030, resulting in an estimated chronically ill population of 171 million. Nearly half of all people with chronic illness have multiple conditions. As a result, many managed care and integrated delivery systems have taken a great interest in correcting the many deficiencies in current management of diseases.

Overcoming these deficiencies requires an absolute transformation of health care, from a system that is essentially reactive—responding mainly when a person is sick—to one that is proactive and focused on keeping a person as healthy as possible. The Chronic Care Model summarizes the basic elements for improving care in health systems at the community, organization, practice, and patient levels.

Top

Improving Chronic Illness Care

Improving Chronic Illness Care (ICIC), a national program of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, was launched in 1998. Housed in the MacColl Center, ICIC's conceptual core is the Chronic Care Model. The RWJF anthology, To Improve Health and Health Care, Volume X, provides a historical perspective on ICIC's early days. The work of ICIC is described below:

Quality improvement: quality and equality

ICIC's Chronic Care Breakthrough Series Collaboratives began in 1999 in partnership with the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Using a clearly defined change package based on the Chronic Care Model, these collaboratives provided participants with proven tools and information to help them make those changes within their system. 

While the Breakthrough Series program was being formed, the Health Resources and Services Administration's Bureau of Primary Health Care launched its ambitious initiative to reduce quality disparities among the clients of community health centers. Since its inception in 1998, ICIC has collaborated with the Bureau and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement on the Health Disparities Collaboratives. A 2007 New England Journal of Medicine article found the Collaboratives significantly improved processes of care.

Top

Making a case for better care

The hallmark of the Chronic Care Model is that it is evidence-based, using only those interventions that have proven themselves in research and in practice. ICIC has assembled supporting bibliographies of peer-reviewed literature covering specific chronic conditions: asthma, depression, diabetes, frailty in older people, hypertension, and congestive heart failure, in addition to the Chronic Care Model itself.

Through a Targeted Research Grants Program, ICIC provided approximately $6 million of funding for peer-reviewed, applied research addressing critical questions about the organization and delivery of chronic illness care in health systems. Grants were used by researchers and practitioners in managed care organizations, group practices, academic institutions or research organizations; applicants from both the private and public sectors were welcomed.

Top

Practice change tools

Top

Enhanced residency training

Since 2005, ICIC and the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) have been facilitating the adoption of the Chronic Care Model by academic medical centers through two collaboratives based in educational institutions: one national, and one focused on California.

These academic collaboratives build on the premise that academic settings are committed to implementation of innovation that is evidence-based and can be shown to benefit patients. This work is doubly important in academic settings, because of their opportunities to incorporate such improvements into the care of future patients through the education of tomorrow's health professionals.

Top

Optimizing geriatric care

Since its formation, the MacColl Center has served as a home for clinical staff wanting to explore new ways to care for specific patient populations. A pilot senior care program by Group Health family practice physician and geriatrician Marty Levine, MD, continued this trend in 2004. Building on the lessons of the John A. Hartford Foundation-funded Senior Resource Team project, the pilot combined six senior health care programs into a complete care system, and was rolled out at Group Health's Burien and Northgate medical centers for a 24-month pilot period. The Senior Support Web offered older patients:

Top

Building the field

A major objective of ICIC has been to build and support the field of chronic illness care. To that end, we designed a series of meetings to stimulate interaction among front-line practitioners, researchers, and policy-makers. In addition to providing a venue for innovators across the country to connect with one another, goals for the three-year Innovations in Research and Practice Congress program were to identify the most promising ideas for improving care and priority directions for research and policy development.

The MacColl Center and the California HealthCare Foundation gave the networking process a major boost by convening a national conference near San Francisco in November 2006. About 80 leaders of 40 organizations in 17 states spent a day and a half together, sharing lessons learned and exploring ways to strengthen their individual and collective efforts. The conference helped crystallize a national perspective on quality improvement, grounded in the practical experience of these diverse participants.

Top

International partnerships

The following are among the Center's scientific collaborations:

The Bellagio conference was called "Improving primary care in Europe and the US: Towards patient-centered, proactive, and coordinated systems of care." Practitioners, researchers, and policy advisers together examined various approaches and strategies based on case studies and technical papers originating from the United Kingdom, Denmark, Spain, United States, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Poland, and Estonia. Participants also assessed technical and managerial findings from health services research—issues that are critical for primary care and health care improvement overall.

Top